Archive

Archive for the ‘Video Use’ Category

UT Video Visits For Inmates Keep Jail Calmer

December 6th, 2011
Comments Off

OGDEN — Nothing like technology to calm things down a bit inside a jail.

What two years ago were twice-weekly visits of family and friends for Weber County Jail inmates, talking through plexiglass with a phone, is now up to eight visits a week or more with the latest evolution of video visitation technology. Report by Standard Examiner.

In October the jail upgraded the video software to allow extra visits — for a nominal fee.

When the video system first replaced the “barrier visits” in the visiting room late in 2009, the weekly inmate half-hour visits went from two to four, said Sheriff Terry Thompson. That capacity now is much expanded since October — probably doubling again — limited pretty much by how often an inmate’s visitor can afford the $10 fee, he said.

The impact of the video systems has been obvious from the start — no more escorting groups of up to 18 inmates at a time to the visiting room.

Prisoners from maximum security had to be escorted in shackles individually, under guard with two or more correctional officers.

“That was a severe safety and security issue, very labor intensive,” Thompson said. “The potential for assaults and those kinds of things on my staff was tremendous.”

“Just the noise alone from walking 18 inmates through the jail to visitation was bad enough,” said Corrections Sgt. Dustin Anthon, one of the direct beneficiaries of video visitation. A steel and concrete jail has no buffers, he explained, with no carpet or upholstery to absorb sound.

“It’s been mutually beneficial, for staff and inmates,” Thompson said.

Now inmates can sit down to one of the 50 terminals spread throughout the jail housing units to take their video phone call.

That extra contact with loved ones, enhanced since October, has made for more manageable inmates, officials said.

“It makes them far less of a problem,” Thompson said. “We absolutely have far less complaints from inmates on visitation issues … and overall, I believe inmate discipline problems in general are down, although I don’t have exact statistics on that.

“I feel their overall demeanor is better, and no question the video system contributes to that.”

Family and friends can schedule and pay for the visits from their home PCs, then go to the jail to connect via 25 terminals available to the public to place their video calls.

Renovo Software, the Minnesota-based company that installed the video system and handles the billing, in a recent news release estimated that adding the fee system allows for “3,500 additional personal paid visits per week without adding to (the jail’s) existing infrastructure.” The jail holds up to 900 inmates at any given time.

Officials didn’t have exact numbers available on the increased visitation since the fee system came online late in October.

Renovo keeps about a third of the $10 fee, the rest going to the jail. Renovo estimates the jail will earn between $9,000 and $18,000 a year from its take. The old barrier visitation room, with 18 small cubicles, or “slots” as they are called, is now reserved for special circumstances, or visits from inmates’ lawyers.

Tammy Utah, Video Use

NY Videoconferencing system installed in Niagara County Jail

November 29th, 2011
Comments Off

LOCKPORT — Niagara County Sheriff James R. Voutour told the County Legislature on Monday that a videoconferencing system has been installed at the County Jail for inmates to confer with probation officers and public defenders.

Voutour said six cameras were installed by a private company at no expense to the county. Report by Buffalo News.

He said that eventually state parole officers may use the system to confer with inmates, and perhaps private attorneys also may do so, although he said they would be charged a fee.

Voutour noted that a videoconferencing system installed several years ago in the County Courthouse was a flop, because state law allows defendants to veto the use of cameras for what would normally be courtroom appearances.

The new system “is more of a benefit to other county departments,” Voutour said.

The proposed 2012 county budget cuts four vacant uniformed officer positions and lays off one civilian computer worker.

One of the reductions was a Drug Task Force investigator, who was demoted to deputy to fill a vacant patrol slot.

Voutour urged the Legislature to restore the drug position, which he said would cost the county $75,000, including benefits.

The budget calls for 105 officers, counting patrol deputies and investigators.

When Majority Leader Richard E. Updegrove asked if it was possible to cut the 129-officer jail staff, Voutour said no.

“We do not want the Department of Corrections to do a staffing study on our jail,” Voutour said.

“We’re probably 15 to 20 [officers] short. I try to keep [state Commissioner of Corrections Thomas A.] Beilein away from me. We’re probably leaner than any other jail in the state our size.”

The jail has a prisoner capacity of 499; Monday’s population was 430, Voutour said.

Voutour also has done away with “safe child” identification cards and child car seat installations at various events to save money.

Training for the SWAT and dive teams has been cut 50 percent, and the county’s payment to Mercy Flight was cut almost in half, saving $13,325.

In response to a question from Minority Leader Dennis F. Virtuoso, D-Niagara Falls, Voutour said the county’s dispatching costs will rise if North Tonawanda transfers its police dispatching to the Sheriff’s Office. He wasn’t sure if there would be counteracting revenue.

A meeting on the switchover is set for next week between Voutour and city officials, but the sheriff said there might be some urgency on the city’s side.

“Their phones failed [Monday] in North Tonawanda. They’re working with a cellphone,” Voutour said.

Tammy New York, Technology, Video Use

Dispute Over Incident Video

February 17th, 2009
Comments Off

sheriff-david-harder1Broome County NY Jail officials have quietly adjusted the way they handle disputes between inmates, now that a former inmate has sued Sheriff David Harder and three jail employees who he says failed to help him during a fight with another inmate. Report from the Binghampton Press & Sun-Bulletin.

However, Harder says he doesn’t believe Broome needs to change its rules about saving video records of jail incidents. He said the cost of extra storage equipment could be prohibitive and still might not have helped resolve the incident that spurred former inmate Richard E. Sipe Jr., 28, to sue for $250,000. “We have machines set up to record the stuff that goes on in there,” Harder said. “But the lawsuit didn’t happen until several months later. The officers looked at the tape (soon after the incident), and said, ‘It’s only a bloody nose.’ How long are you going to have me save this stuff?” …

County officials said last week that a video of the incident was not retained. They later amended that to say a copy might have been made, but no one has been able to find it. State law does not require counties to retain jail videotapes, though it does require paper records to be kept for specified periods … Broome’s jail video system currently over-writes its recordings after about 30 days, unless a staffer elects to save a copy of an incident, officials have said …

Deputy County Attorney Aaron Marcus said Broome likely will release some or all of the records soon [in relation to media FOI requests]. He has said that jail employees should have retained a copy of the tape when they learned that Sipe claimed to have been assaulted, and asked for medical attention. Sipe says in court papers that he tried within three days of the incident to file charges against Mable.The county acknowledges that Sipe received attention from jail medical staff on multiple days after the incident. But it has not been able to say if he was seen because of the Mable incident.

vericatrajkova Inmate Grievances, Inmate Lawsuits, NY Broome County, New York, Video Use

Connecticut Goes Video

November 25th, 2008
Comments Off

With high fuel prices and tight state budgets, Connecticut and at least 10 other states — Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota and Tennessee — report using teleconferences between judges and inmates more often to improve public safety and save some cash.

It costs the state of Connecticut at least $1,600 every time multiple murder suspect Joshua Komisarjevsky appears in a courtroom. Despite his slight build and boyish appearance, Komisarjevsky is classified as a high security inmate, facing charges of murder, rape and arson from a 2007 home invasion in which a woman and her two daughters were killed in Cheshire. At every court appearance, a special detail of corrections officers and two state troopers are assigned to accompany him. So, when Komisarjevsky was due in family court earlier this year on an unrelated matter, prison officials opted for a teleconference. Instead an expensive trip to the courthouse, officers escorted Komisarjevsky down the hall from his cell at the MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution in Suffield, to a room where he participated in the hearing via two-way video …

Although some inmates say they’d prefer to plead their cases in person, correction officials believe the technology offers a fair alternative to spending millions of dollars moving inmates in person. “It’s vehicles, it’s gasoline, it’s maintenance of those vehicles, it’s the driver plus another officer for security purposes,” said Connecticut Corrections Commissioner Theresa C. Lantz. “It’s all the work that is involved in taking an inmate out of a facility, putting them in a secure vehicle, transporting them to another location.”

On Oct. 1, Connecticut finished installing teleconferencing equipment in all of its 18 correctional facilities. During that month, about 151 inmates used the system to participate in hearings involving parole, civil and family court, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Social Security Administration. The state’s court system has a working group looking at expanding the technique. “As the economy worsens, we’re all going to have to be a little more creative in how we handle these things,” said Judge Patrick Carroll, the deputy chief court administrator in Connecticut …

Kansas also is moving toward expanding teleconferencing. It already uses the technology for parole hearings and internal disciplinary matters. For a state encompassing more than 82,000 square miles, Department of Corrections spokesman Bill Miskell said officials believe it’s a way to save both time and fuel. “If there’s a way we can limit a 350-mile drive for a three-hour discussion with six or seven or eight inmates, we’re going to try to do that,” he said.

Pennsylvania has been using teleconferencing since the mid-1990s. Susan McNaughton, a spokeswoman for the state prison system, said it was originally used to let inmate patients meet with a doctor. Today, it’s used for court cases, parole hearings and immigration hearings. “We have video conference coordinators at each facility,” said McNaughton, referring to the state’s 27 prisons. “It’s practically a full-time job when you think about all the hearings inmates are involved in.”

Much more on this at the Rocky Mountain Telegram.

vericatrajkova Connecticut, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Video Use

Daily Sweep 071227

December 27th, 2007
Comments Off

Total Telephone Company adds video visitation functionality to Midland County Texas. In South Dakota, the Superintendent of Juveniles, Chuck Gilson, has retired; Jeff Haiar has taken over the position on an interim basis. An attorney (and political opponent of the Governor) says the Maine administration’s plans for jail consolidation contain hidden costs.

vericatrajkova Inmate Telephones, Juvenile Justice, Maine, South Dakota, TX Midland County, Texas, Video Use, Visits