Archive

Archive for the ‘PA Cambria County’ Category

State Inmates On Offer “For A Little Bit Of Profit”

April 15th, 2009
Comments Off

pa-doc-logoWith about 50 empty beds at the Bedford County PA Prison, Warden Dan Keen is optimistic about getting paid to fill those spaces with inmates from Pennsylvania state correctional institutions.

On May 1, Keen will join several other jail wardens from across the state at a Department of Corrections meeting in Elizabethtown to discuss the possibility of sending state prisoners who are near their parole dates to county prisons that likely have more space. “Every state facility in Pennsylvania is overflowing,” said Keen, who added that the new facilities being built won’t be completed for several years.  In the meantime, local jails are being asked to take inmates close to being paroled for a “little bit of profit.”

Keen said he would like to receive $55 a day per inmate for reimbursement, or more than $2,500 a day if the 50 empty beds at the 185-bed jail are filled …

Cambria County Prison Warden John Prebish also will attend the May 1 meeting and said the ability to help out with costs to the county, as well as lower the strain on state institutions, is appealing.  “It’s not cheap to run a jail,” Prebish said. “It’s not a profitable environment for a county. Any way we can offset our costs, we’ll do it.”   The 500-bed facility has about 100 empty beds, although that number jumps up and down significantly depending on things like holding immigration cases in the county …

Blair County Prison Warden Michael Johnston also will attend the meeting and said while he doesn’t know much about the plan’s specifics, it’s an idea he would be open to considering. “Right now, I have some space that I could do that with,” Johnston said. “It would be something I would be very interested in.”   There currently are 48 empty beds in the 342-bed facility. There also are about 10 to 12 state inmates awaiting transfer from the Blair County Prison, down from the 25 that were waiting transfer six weeks ago, Johnston said. He said he would like to see reimbursement for the time in between state-sentencing and transport from the county prisons. Johnston said he currently charges $50 a day for out-of-county inmates, although he may raise that amount to $55, identical to Centre County’s cost, at the beginning of 2010.

vericatrajkova County-State Issues, Economic Issues, Overcrowding, PA Bedford County, PA Blair County, PA Cambria County, Pennsylvania

The Cell Phone Problem

October 12th, 2008
Comments Off

People in jail aren’t supposed to have cell phones.  But across America, one way or another, they’re getting them.  The following is a view from Pennsylvania:

In Maryland, inmate Patrick Albert Byers Jr. used one to arrange the murder of a witness in a homicide case, prosecutors say. He’s facing the federal death penalty. In Canada, imprisoned drug lord Rivo D’Onofrio used cell phones to make thousands of calls to his cronies. “He gabbed for hours and hours,” a prosecutor said.  In a notorious case, drug kingpin Ronald Whethers used cell phones to run his narcotics empire from the Westmoreland County Prison, leading to a state law prohibiting cell phones behind bars.

Corrections officers at home and abroad are struggling with how to keep inmates from wreaking havoc by phone.  “They’re pulling their hair out,” said Louis Garzarelli, a former U.S. Bureau of Prisons intelligence officer who teaches criminology at Mount Aloysius College in Cambria County.  “They really don’t know what to do about it. The damage that is done is unaccountable. They don’t know how many are in there.”   The problem has reached absurd proportions in some states.  A Maryland legislator was stunned when a prisoner called him on a cell phone to complain about his prison.  In Texas, a warden received a call from the mother of an inmate asking why her son was getting such poor cell phone reception behind bars.  Some other countries have it a lot worse.  Two years ago in Brazil, hundreds of incarcerated gang members used cell phones to coordinate riots at 73 prisons and attacks on the outside against police. The wave of violence paralyzed the state of Sao Paulo and left 160 people dead.

The United States has seen nothing on that scale, but officials are seizing thousands of cell phones nationwide.  Some are brought in by visitors, who have been known to hide them in body cavities.  But the majority are supplied by guards, often in exchange for bribes. The going price: $500. In Pennsylvania, corrections officers can themselves end up in jail under the law inspired by the Ronald Whethers case in 2000.  In Cambria County, for example, former part-time officer Donald Burkett is awaiting trial on a charge of letting an inmate use his personal cell phone to call his girlfriend. A second guard is under investigation.  “It’s not a problem in every jail, but it is in most jails,” said John Prebish Jr., the warden. “You have everything from guards smuggling them in to inmates and visitors smuggling them in.”  The state system generally gets high marks for cell phone detection, but it’s not immune. At SCI Graterford, four guards were indicted last year on federal charges of supplying cell phones and drugs to inmates in exchange for bribes.

The newest threat behind bars is the SIM card, a tiny, portable memory chip that allows lots of prisoners to use a single phone.   The prison system simply hasn’t kept up with communications technology.  “Cell phones become a huge threat to three people: the officers inside the prison, the prisoners themselves, and the public,” said Terry Bittner, director of security products for EVI Technology, a Maryland company whose cell phone detection system is used in one Pennsylvania prison, some facilities in the federal system and elsewhere. There are three ways to crack down: stop the phones from coming in, stop inmates from using them or stop the signals from reaching the prison.  But there are complications with all three.  No screening process, called “portal security” in prison-speak, works all the time.

In Pennsylvania, the Department of Corrections said it seized a total of eight phones, batteries or chargers from prison cells so far in 2008. Six of the system’s 27 prisons didn’t provide information on phone seizures to the department’s public relations staff.  The department seized 15 last year and 10 in 2006.   But some other states seize hundreds in a given year. In California, for example, officials have confiscated 1,331 phones from prisoners so far this fiscal year.

How can Pennsylvania be finding so few? The state says it’s because the phones don’t get into prison in the first place.  “We really are that good,” said Susan McNaughton, corrections spokeswoman.  Unlike many other states where guard unions have successfully resisted security measures, officers in Pennsylvania have to pass through metal detectors and are subject to searches.   “I think the numbers show that we are not experiencing problems to the extent that some other state DOCs are,” she said. “I think that is attributed to the fact that we have a multi-pronged approach to keeping contraband, drugs and cell phones out of our prisons” …

At some lockups, officers rely on sophisticated electronic wands, which cost up to $15,000 each.   They work, but critics point out that the user has to be very close to the signal and that the device generates a lot of false alarms, such as setting off alerts on gum wrappers.  Many jails, tight on resources, stick with the low-tech approach.  “We just search all the time,” said Ramon Rustin, warden at the Allegheny County Jail. “We do sweeps. We will lock down the units and send in dogs. We’re searching for everything, not just cell phones.” He said his staff has found one phone in his four years in charge …

Cell phone jammers are illegal in the U.S., even in prisons, under the 1996 Communications Act. But an upcoming experiment in South Carolina, and a series of petitions pending before the Federal Communications Commission, are forcing a hard look at whether they should be.  Next month, a Florida company called CellAntenna plans to demonstrate its jamming technology at a South Carolina prison, risking enforcement action by the FCC that could include fines of up $16,000 a day.   Jamming is legal in other countries, although a lack of accuracy has been a complication in urban areas. Jammers set up at a prison in Brazil, for example, also knocked out cell service to 200,000 people who lived nearby …The cell phone industry, threatened by any attempt to jam its signals, has asked that jamming equipment remain illegal.

vericatrajkova Brazil, Canada, Inmate Telephones, Maryland, PA Allegheny County, PA Cambria County, PA Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas

Cambria County Jail Helps Pay For Itself

August 19th, 2008
Comments Off

Illegal immigrants and federal prisoners aren’t just filling cells at the Cambria County PA Prison. They’re also boosting county coffers as officials look to minimize the impact to taxpayers of operating a prison.

As of July 31, revenues totaled $1.197 million from housing inmates from other counties, the illegal immigrants and federal prisoners, he said. Not included in that total are other revenues, including;

– $89,000 from telephone fees on calls made by inmates.
– $44,000 for Cambria’s guards making federal transports and $5,400 for transports to magistrates’ hearings.
– $12,800 from other counties and the federal prison system for their guards to attend the training classes held periodically by prison staff.

“We’re making two trips a week, with one or two vans, to pick up the illegal immigrants in Pittsburgh,” Prebish said. “They stay here for a couple of days to a couple of months until federal Immigration moves them to York for deportation.”

Federal authorities pay Cambria $51.53 a day for each inmate housed here. Counties are charged $45, though that may be increased, he said. The 60-bed dormitory addition that was opened last summer has made it possible for Cambria to have more open beds. The construction, funded with $574,000 from unused capital funds, is paying off, President Commissioner P.J. Stevens said, offering additional revenues and tax relief for years to come.

But even that amount wouldn’t be enough to fully offset the $6.5 million cost of operations – a figure that includes neither the debt-service payment nor employee benefits, which could add $2.5 million to the total, said Mike Gelles, Cambria’s finance director.

More detail can be found at The Tribune-Democrat.

vericatrajkova Female Inmates, ICE, Immigration Issues / Illegal Aliens, PA Cambria County