Archive

Archive for the ‘PA Westmoreland County’ Category

The Cell Phone Problem

October 12th, 2008
Comments Off

People in jail aren’t supposed to have cell phones.  But across America, one way or another, they’re getting them.  The following is a view from Pennsylvania:

In Maryland, inmate Patrick Albert Byers Jr. used one to arrange the murder of a witness in a homicide case, prosecutors say. He’s facing the federal death penalty. In Canada, imprisoned drug lord Rivo D’Onofrio used cell phones to make thousands of calls to his cronies. “He gabbed for hours and hours,” a prosecutor said.  In a notorious case, drug kingpin Ronald Whethers used cell phones to run his narcotics empire from the Westmoreland County Prison, leading to a state law prohibiting cell phones behind bars.

Corrections officers at home and abroad are struggling with how to keep inmates from wreaking havoc by phone.  “They’re pulling their hair out,” said Louis Garzarelli, a former U.S. Bureau of Prisons intelligence officer who teaches criminology at Mount Aloysius College in Cambria County.  “They really don’t know what to do about it. The damage that is done is unaccountable. They don’t know how many are in there.”   The problem has reached absurd proportions in some states.  A Maryland legislator was stunned when a prisoner called him on a cell phone to complain about his prison.  In Texas, a warden received a call from the mother of an inmate asking why her son was getting such poor cell phone reception behind bars.  Some other countries have it a lot worse.  Two years ago in Brazil, hundreds of incarcerated gang members used cell phones to coordinate riots at 73 prisons and attacks on the outside against police. The wave of violence paralyzed the state of Sao Paulo and left 160 people dead.

The United States has seen nothing on that scale, but officials are seizing thousands of cell phones nationwide.  Some are brought in by visitors, who have been known to hide them in body cavities.  But the majority are supplied by guards, often in exchange for bribes. The going price: $500. In Pennsylvania, corrections officers can themselves end up in jail under the law inspired by the Ronald Whethers case in 2000.  In Cambria County, for example, former part-time officer Donald Burkett is awaiting trial on a charge of letting an inmate use his personal cell phone to call his girlfriend. A second guard is under investigation.  “It’s not a problem in every jail, but it is in most jails,” said John Prebish Jr., the warden. “You have everything from guards smuggling them in to inmates and visitors smuggling them in.”  The state system generally gets high marks for cell phone detection, but it’s not immune. At SCI Graterford, four guards were indicted last year on federal charges of supplying cell phones and drugs to inmates in exchange for bribes.

The newest threat behind bars is the SIM card, a tiny, portable memory chip that allows lots of prisoners to use a single phone.   The prison system simply hasn’t kept up with communications technology.  “Cell phones become a huge threat to three people: the officers inside the prison, the prisoners themselves, and the public,” said Terry Bittner, director of security products for EVI Technology, a Maryland company whose cell phone detection system is used in one Pennsylvania prison, some facilities in the federal system and elsewhere. There are three ways to crack down: stop the phones from coming in, stop inmates from using them or stop the signals from reaching the prison.  But there are complications with all three.  No screening process, called “portal security” in prison-speak, works all the time.

In Pennsylvania, the Department of Corrections said it seized a total of eight phones, batteries or chargers from prison cells so far in 2008. Six of the system’s 27 prisons didn’t provide information on phone seizures to the department’s public relations staff.  The department seized 15 last year and 10 in 2006.   But some other states seize hundreds in a given year. In California, for example, officials have confiscated 1,331 phones from prisoners so far this fiscal year.

How can Pennsylvania be finding so few? The state says it’s because the phones don’t get into prison in the first place.  “We really are that good,” said Susan McNaughton, corrections spokeswoman.  Unlike many other states where guard unions have successfully resisted security measures, officers in Pennsylvania have to pass through metal detectors and are subject to searches.   “I think the numbers show that we are not experiencing problems to the extent that some other state DOCs are,” she said. “I think that is attributed to the fact that we have a multi-pronged approach to keeping contraband, drugs and cell phones out of our prisons” …

At some lockups, officers rely on sophisticated electronic wands, which cost up to $15,000 each.   They work, but critics point out that the user has to be very close to the signal and that the device generates a lot of false alarms, such as setting off alerts on gum wrappers.  Many jails, tight on resources, stick with the low-tech approach.  “We just search all the time,” said Ramon Rustin, warden at the Allegheny County Jail. “We do sweeps. We will lock down the units and send in dogs. We’re searching for everything, not just cell phones.” He said his staff has found one phone in his four years in charge …

Cell phone jammers are illegal in the U.S., even in prisons, under the 1996 Communications Act. But an upcoming experiment in South Carolina, and a series of petitions pending before the Federal Communications Commission, are forcing a hard look at whether they should be.  Next month, a Florida company called CellAntenna plans to demonstrate its jamming technology at a South Carolina prison, risking enforcement action by the FCC that could include fines of up $16,000 a day.   Jamming is legal in other countries, although a lack of accuracy has been a complication in urban areas. Jammers set up at a prison in Brazil, for example, also knocked out cell service to 200,000 people who lived nearby …The cell phone industry, threatened by any attempt to jam its signals, has asked that jamming equipment remain illegal.

vericatrajkova Brazil, Canada, Inmate Telephones, Maryland, PA Allegheny County, PA Cambria County, PA Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas

Who Pays?

October 8th, 2008
Comments Off

The furlough of a Westmoreland County PA Prison inmate just minutes after he took a suicide leap was not enough to avert a $554,000 medical bill.   But that check won’t be in the mail anytime soon.

County officials said Monday they furloughed Tadd A. Naylor, 22, of North Belle Vernon to avoid paying for his care. Naylor jumped 12 feet from a second-floor balcony and fell onto steel tables before hitting concrete pavement. He was hospitalized for four months.  Jail officials rushed to get him furloughed before a helicopter lifted off to take him to UPMC in Pittsburgh on May 2. Naylor was furloughed by Westmoreland County Judge Debra A. Pezze just minutes after he hit the floor …

County officials learned Monday of the bill from UPMC health system. In a letter asking for payment, UPMC said the furlough would not save the county from paying the bill.  “The bills were initially submitted to Medical Assistance but were denied because it was determined the person was in custody of the Westmoreland County Jail at the time that the injuries were incurred,” says the Sept. 15 letter signed by UPMC lawyer Yashmin H. Mukhtar.  Commissioner Tom Balya countered: “Our position is the inmate was furloughed and once he was furloughed he’s not the county’s responsibility. We’ll tell that to UPMC and see where it goes.”

Walton enacted the furlough plan to try to combat rising health costs for inmates injured at the jail. Earlier this year, the county received a $420,000 medical bill for an inmate who jumped over the same railing. The county has since installed a $20,000 fence.  County officials for years have struggled with rising health care costs for inmates. They want the state to pay those costs for inmates with no private insurance coverage. Inmates with private insurance should have to submit medical claims to their carrier, Balya said. “This is about the larger issue about why counties are responsible for inmate health care.”

More on this nationwide issue at Pittsburgh Tribune Review.

vericatrajkova Inmate Health, PA Westmoreland County

Daily Sweep 080206

February 6th, 2008
Comments Off

vericatrajkova Arizona, CA San Luis Obispo County, Inmate Telephones, Israel, MTC, PA Westmoreland County, Private Prisons, Re-Entry

Daily Sweep 080109

January 9th, 2008
Comments Off

New Hampshire DOC looking to add “good time” provisions to sentence management. Westmoreland County PA has lowest inmate population in 5 years. A new warden is appointed in Monroe County PA. Iowa may build a new prison. Washington State DOC has opened a new maximum-security unit at the Monroe Prison complex.

vericatrajkova Iowa, New Hampshire, Overcrowding, PA Monroe County, PA Westmoreland County, Sentencing, Washington