Archive

Archive for the ‘Australasia’ Category

Tasmania Brit Expert To Oversee Tas Prison Reform

February 6th, 2012
Comments Off

A British corrections expert has been appointed to oversee reforms at Tasmania’s troubled Risdon Prison.

Brian Edwards has been announced as the state prison service’s director of change management more than 10 months after a report recommended the position. Report by 9 News.

Mr Edwards has been given the job for two years following a report last year from former Australian Federal Police chief Mick Palmer on the problems at Risdon.

The prison has been the scene of two hostage dramas and three break-outs in recent years, including last month’s escape by two inmates from its adjacent minimum security facility.

“I have been a strong advocate for corrections reform and we need to put resources into it, even in a time of budgetary stress,” Minister for Corrections Nick McKim said in a statement on Monday.

“Mr Edwards’ appointment is a major step forward in the process Mick Palmer identified for progressing operational and cultural reform.”

Mr Edwards has worked in the British prison system for 34 years and was awarded an OBE for his contribution in 2006.

Opposition spokeswoman Vanessa Goodwin said the appointment had taken too long.

“While the Liberals welcome the appointment of Brian Edwards as the Tasmanian Prison Service change manager, it is long overdue,” she said.

“The appointment of a change manager was one of the key recommendations to come out of the Palmer Report and should have been done sooner.”

Mr Edwards will begin in the position on February 27.

Tammy Corrections Reform, Tasmania

Australia Prisoners Recommended For Parole Dropped 71 Per Cent

November 24th, 2011
Comments Off
jail_main-420x0

Refusal to grant parole and the cancellation of parole had increased the WA prison population by over 700 at an estimated cost of about $115, 950 per day.

Taxpayers are footing an extra $116, 000 a day to keep prisoners inside jail and not grant them parole, according to a new report tabled in Parliament.

Figures outlined in the report show that since 2009, the number of offenders released on parole in Western Australia had fallen significantly, dropping from 92 per cent to 21 per cent, and there had been a significant increase in the rate of cancelled parole orders, which almost doubled to about four parolees out of 100 having their orders cancelled. Report by The Sydney Morning Herald.

This means WA now has a lower rate of offenders on parole and a higher rate of offenders in prison compared to the Australian average.

In March 2011, the rate of offenders on parole was 27.6 per 100,000 individuals in WA and 69.5 per 100,000 in Australia. In contrast the rate of imprisonment in the state is 213.6 per 100,000, compared with the Australian average of 125.

Auditor-General Colin Murphy found that most of this could be attributed to the Department of Corrective Services’ stricter approach to parolee non-compliance with parole conditions, resulting in a big increase in the rate of cancelled parole orders.

Mr Murphy said the department had responded to the findings of several internal reviews of its management of parolees and over the last two years had made significant changes in both policy and practice.

“There is no doubt parole is a controversial issue and there is ongoing debate about the best way to ensure the community remains safe,” he said.

“Minimising the risks and maximising the benefits of parole relies on the effective and consistent supervision and monitoring of parolees, making sure that offenders comply with parole conditions, and when they do not, appropriate action is taken.

“Stricter enforcement of parole conditions by DCS has meant that breaches are more often resulting in consequences for the parolee, such as the cancelling of their parole.”

Mr Murphy said the department’s refusal to grant parole and its cancellation of parole had increased the prison population by over 700 at an estimated cost of about $115, 950 per day.

“Parole carries a short term crime risk, but it is also a cost effective way to supervise some offenders, and can help reduce the long term risk of reoffending by providing controlled reintegration into the community,” Mr Murphy said.

“Even though DCS’s policy framework has been improved there is inconsistency in the management of parolees and the monitoring of some parole conditions.

“If parole conditions are not monitored effectively then some parolees may be breaching conditions without DCS knowing and some parolees may return to the behaviours which contributed to their initial imprisonment.

“Unapproved changes in accommodation, the way DCS uses drug tests and the manner in which they ensure program attendance are examples of conditions that can be better and more consistently monitored.

“DCS has made significant changes to its management of parolees, but there is more to be done if it is to minimise the risks and maximise the benefits of parole.”

In recent years the Adult Community Corrections philosophy has moved from a “welfare based” model to one which ensures compliance with all community orders, according to the department.

“[It] provides a robust, contemporary and credible system of supervision of offenders which focuses on risk assessment, risk management and public protection as the priority,” they said.

This resulted in the development of the Enforcement Policy in 2009, which addressed the response by staff and stakeholders to non-compliance by parolees to order requirements.

But the report’s key findings suggested that:

  • The introduction of the Enforcement Policy by DCS has not yet led to consistent supervision of offenders. Despite efforts by DCS to communicate policy changes, understanding and application of the policy is variable.
  • Changes to the Enforcement Policy have reduced the discretion of community correctional officers to deal with breaches of parole conditions and requires all breaches to be reported to the parole board. It is not yet clear if this change will reduce the frequency that offenders breach parole or if the increased cancellation of parole will have a negative impact on long term reoffending rates.
  • Issues identified in DCS internal professional standards reviews – such as a lack of senior staff oversight, not adequately using assessment tools that help determine a parolee’s supervision level and reporting frequency and not always explaining to a parolee their obligations – were still evident despite DCS taking a proactive approach to identify them.
  • Because DCS is not monitoring all parole conditions, and for some conditions relies on parolees to self-report non-compliance, some parolees may be breaching their orders without DCS knowing. This is because some conditions such as “not to enter licensed premises” or “not to have contact with females under 16″ are impractical to monitor.  The stricter enforcement of parole conditions reduce the incentive for parolees to self-report issues that could result in cancellation of their parole.
  • Better monitoring of some parole conditions is needed. The use of drug tests and the monitoring of program attendance are inconsistent; reducing the effectiveness of both conditions. There was no evidence that DCS had confirmed program attendance for over 55 per cent of parolees. Similar inconsistencies were evident with parolees requiring drug testing. Not checking these conditions often enough may enable a parolee to return to high risk behaviours without DCS addressing the increased risk.

The report has recommended that the effectiveness of parole should be improved by:

  • Ensuring staff have a consistent understanding of its parole policies.
  • The department conduct regular reviews of staff compliance and suitability of monitoring methods, including parolee’s accommodation, drug testing and attendance at programs.
  • Examine the impact and effectiveness of the Enforcement Policy and other parole initiatives.
  • Improve the integration of offender information so that correctional officers have better access to up-to-date, comprehensive documents.

The department has welcomed the report and the recommendations, saying that it had already commenced a significant body of work into addressing a number of concerns highlighted by this review as well as other internal directed reviews.

“The review undertaken by the Office of the Auditor-General has highlighted the department’s need to not only ensure that a sound communication strategy is in place for the dissemination of policy and procedural change, but that the information communicated is embedded in operational practice,” it said in the report.

“This issue has previously been identified by the Division and a number of strategies have been implemented which already show very positive improvement in enforcement.

“The key focus for DCS is to contribute to community safety by upholding the integrity of custodial and non-custodial sentences and by positively influencing offender behaviour to reduce reoffending.

“The department acknowledges the need for continuous improvement in compliance with policies and procedures governing the management of parolees in the community and will use the Auditor General’s report to inform future developments.”

Tammy Probation and Parole, Western Australia

Offenders Get Breaks Over Strained System

April 19th, 2009
Comments Off

south-australia-map

Criminals are using the lack of rehabilitation in South Australian jails to win less jail time.

In the past 12 months, evidence of the lack of rehabilitation has been considered by judges when:

  • Releasing a multiple child sex offender from indefinite detention partly because a lack of resources had delayed rehabilitation.
  • Overturning the indefinite detention of a rapist, partly because it was “unfair” he was denied rehabilitation reserved for those soon to be released.
  • Fixing a non-parole period for a drug user, commenting he could access better rehabilitation in the community.
  • Suspending the sentence of a man convicted of assault, commenting this would allow him to access community rehabilitation.
  • Lowering a non-parole period for a sex offender, commenting prison could set back his recovery.

Chair of the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee George Mancini said the trend was increasing because of a State Government policy of longer sentences. “It is an aspect of overcrowding, of longer terms of imprisonment and not spending sufficient resources on rehabilitation,” he said.  A spokesman for Prisons Minister Tom Koutsantonis defended the Government’s record on rehabilitation.  “Prior to 2005, there was no sex offender treatment in SA prisons at all,” the spokesman said.

A number of the recent decisions have been made on the advice of Dr Raeside, a consulting psychiatrist to the Department of Correctional Services, who has been praised by judges for his professionalism and is highly critical of rehabilitation in the state’s jails.

“I figure if we are going to lock more people up for longer (whether one agrees with that policy or not) then we ought to do something for them whilst they are there to reduce the chances of them re-offending and make the community safer when they get out,” he said.

vericatrajkova Australasia, Australia, Drug Treatment & Diversion, Early Release, INTERNATIONAL, Inmate Programs, Private Prisons, Sex Offenders, South Australia

Privatization A Prelude To Violence: Officers

April 13th, 2009
Comments Off

nsw-parklea-prisonNew South Wales, Australia, prison officers say an Easter weekend outbreak of violence at Parklea prison is a prelude to further trouble in the state’s jails if the State Government privatises prison operations.  Story from the Canberra Times.

The Prison Officers Vocational Branch, the union representing officers, says private jail operators would not employ enough staff to contain the sort of incident that occurred last Friday, in which a group of inmates, allegedly bikies, attacked another prisoner during morning muster, reportedly using sharpened toothbrushes.

The Department of Corrective Services has downplayed the incident. It said only seven prisoners were involved, and only one inmate, Mesbah Mirzaei, who allegedly led the attack, was a member of the bikie gang Notorious.

vericatrajkova Australasia, Australia, Gangs (STGs), INTERNATIONAL, New South Wales, Private Prisons

NZ Minister Proposes Big Increase For Parole

March 29th, 2009
Comments Off

nz-judith-collinsNew Zealand’s Corrections Minister Judith Collins says she has asked for substantially more money to improve rehabilitation rates and the parole service, according to NZPA.

“We’ve got to put a far better effort into rehabilitation and this government has promised to double the spaces available for drug rehabilitation,” she said today on TV One’s new Q&A programme.   “There is a very substantial budget bid in.”

Ms Collins said she was also bidding for more money in the May 28 budget for probation officers.   “That’s also substantial…we have to have that parole service working really well because they deal with a lot of community-based sentences,” she said.  “Unless we want to keep locking people up for longer and longer times … we have to have it working extremely well.”

vericatrajkova Australasia, INTERNATIONAL, New Zealand, Probation and Parole

Private Prison Contractor Paints Rosy Picture

March 27th, 2009
Comments Off

sercologo_tcm3-13101A company expected to bid for contracts to operate two jails in Australia has backed facilities in which inmates have keys to their cells and are on a first-name basis with their jailers. Gary Sturgess, research director of the U.K.-based Serco Group, will tell a New South Wales, Australia, parliamentary inquiry Friday that decency, not efficiency, is the main reason to privatize jails.  This report from Fox News Australia.

He says overseas experience shows that prisoners enjoy more privileges — including being given the keys to their own cells — in correctional systems where private and public providers compete … Prisoners in these systems spend more time out of their cells and have far greater interaction with their jailers — with whom they are frequently on first-name terms — than in systems where public providers face no competition, Sturgess says.  The results are safer jails and lower rates of reoffending.

Serco is expected to bid for the contracts to operate Cessnock prison, in the Hunter Valley, and Parklea prison, in western Sydney, when the jails are privatized this year.  The company already operates one jail in Victoria and one in Western Australia.

Sturgess’s submission to the upper house inquiry links private jail services in Britain to the “decency agenda” pursued by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.   “Contract prisons in the U.K. are more humane, partly because government demanded a higher standard when writing the original contracts, partly because price was not allowed to dominate the procurement process, and partly because the political and policy environment at the time when the market was first established was focused on the quality of prison life,” the submission from Serco argues.   He said the inmates in low- and medium-security prisons in Britain had been allowed to hold duplicate keys to their own cells, which improved both efficiency and decency.

vericatrajkova Australasia, INTERNATIONAL, New South Wales, Private Prisons, Serco Group, Victoria, Western Australia

Jail Dispute Flares In Australia

March 17th, 2009
Comments Off

nsw-cessnock-jailA secret plan to move all prisoners from Cessnock Jail in New South Wales under the cover of darkness took place despite union officials slapping an emergency ban on the transfers.  This report from the Daily Telegraph.

A convoy of prison vans – staffed by senior executive officers – was sent to the jail to begin staging the mass transfer of all 460 inmates from the prison.  The operation got underway shortly after 11pm with prisoners being loaded 20 at a time into six prison vans for the journey to Sydney, where they were to be placed in a number of other correctional centres.

Union officials branded the operation as a recipe for disaster, claiming safety standards had been ignored.   Public Service Association executive secretary Steve Turner said a ban had been placed on the movement of all prisoners last night.   “It is hard enough to move one angry prisoner, let alone 20 at a time,” Mr Turner said …

According to sources inside the jail the first indication prisoners had of the move was when cell doors opened and they were ordered into trucks.   “They will leave the jail empty-handed and they will be angry,” a source told The Daily Telegraph. They were to be transferred to Long Bay, Silverwater Prison and the John Maroney Correctional Centre.

Cessnock, which has been at the centre of the privatisation dispute between the State Government and the Corrective Services Union, has 460 minimum security prisoners and 100 maximum security prisoners.   The Government’s plans to privatise prisons has upset prison workers, with stop work meetings and protests organised in the past few months.  Earlier this month, prison officers refused to work overtime.

Former union boss John Robertson led the campaign against the Government’s power privatisation plans but since becoming Prisons Minister he supports prison privatisation.

vericatrajkova Australasia, Australia, INTERNATIONAL, New South Wales

NZ Editorial Flays “Whitewash” Report On Parole

March 11th, 2009
Comments Off

nz_iain_rennieNew Zealand State Services Commissioner, Iain Rennie, has delivered his report on the well-publicised problems of the parole service.  And the New Zealand Herald has delivered its verdict on Mr Rennie’s report:

By any yardstick, Mr Rennie has failed miserably. He has found no one accountable in terms worthy of justifying dismissal. That includes the chief executive of the Corrections Department, Barry Matthews, and the parole head, Katrina Casey. And there is not a murmur about who else, among the problem-plagued department’s staff, should be held accountable for these “serious failings”. The Government’s quest for public-sector accountability seems to have passed Mr Rennie by.

His report is the more abject in that he confirms the department has been failing to make the grade. Corrections’ internal standard is 85 per cent compliance with its own parole management procedures. Last December, it managed 80 per cent. Further, Mr Rennie judged that the department could have moved earlier last year to manage the potential risk to public safety caused by far more offenders being placed on community-based sentences …

The commissioner does not only fudge the issues of accountability. He is equally inept when reporting on the second part of his assignment: what should be done to restore public confidence in Corrections? He suggests the public had simply not picked up on the fact that the department has learned lessons after the deaths of Mr Kuchenbecker, Debbie Ashton – also the victim of a parolee – and Liam Ashley, who was murdered in the back of a prison van … Most logically, the restoration of public confidence would start with the exit of Mr Matthews. Only the identification and dismissal of lower-level staff, who were guilty for the most grievous breaches of parole monitoring, would have rendered that unnecessary. Mr Rennie’s report might have propelled matters to that conclusion. It has not.

There is a lot more background in the article at the NZ Herald.

vericatrajkova Australasia, INTERNATIONAL, New Zealand, Probation and Parole

New Zealand To Privatize Prisons

March 10th, 2009
Comments Off

nz-pm-john-keyThe government is looking to move some of New Zealand’s prisons back in the hands of private operators.

It has been done before, but opening the doors to a privately run prison was a five year experiment snuffed out by the Labour government.   Prime Minister John Key though is convinced that private competition could improve New Zealand’s struggling prison system.  “They were an effective operator from a cost perspective so in my view competition is a healthy thing,” says Key …

Auckland’s remand prison opened in 2000 and it was run by Australian Correctional Management, an Australian company. Despite one escape and a subsequent fine of $50,000, fears of a sloppily run prison did not eventuate.   “They key to their success is they are penalised if they screw up,” says Criminologist Greg Newbold.    But in 2005 the prison was back in the Department of Corrections’ hands.   The Labour government decided that only the state should look after the state’s prisoners, which was a view shared by prison reformers.

This story is from NZ TV.  On the site is an interesting 2:39 video related to this article.

vericatrajkova Australasia, INTERNATIONAL, New Zealand, Private Prisons

More Officer Protests In New South Wales

February 24th, 2009
Comments Off

goulburnjailgate1Prison officers at Goulburn Jail will walk off the job today to rally against the NSW Government’s push to privatise jails, warning that the Goulburn facility could now be on the hit list.

The NSW Public Service Association (PSA) said the walkout follows Corrective Services Commissioner Ron Woodham’s admissions this week that the sell-offs were an attempt to break the strength of their prison officers’ union …

PSA assistant general secretary Steve Turner said the Government has to come clean on its privatisation plans.   “(Monday) Commissioner Woodham revealed planning was at an advanced stage for a 500 bed privately funded and operated prison in the Grafton shire,” Mr Turner said.  “First Cessnock and Parklea, now Grafton, tomorrow it could be Goulburn – where will it stop?”

vericatrajkova Australasia, Australia, INTERNATIONAL, New South Wales, Private Prisons